<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onto Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelfightsback.com/2010/12/onto-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/12/onto-appeal/</link>
	<description>It's about more than just music.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel Fights Back &#187; Jason Harrow: Day 2: It&#8217;s all about statutory damages</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/12/onto-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-99587</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Fights Back &#187; Jason Harrow: Day 2: It&#8217;s all about statutory damages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 13:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=812#comment-99587</guid>
		<description>[...] several major fights about just how far such damages can go, like whether you can recover over $600,000 against a regular filesharer who earned no profits and caused no measurable harm, or whether you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] several major fights about just how far such damages can go, like whether you can recover over $600,000 against a regular filesharer who earned no profits and caused no measurable harm, or whether you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rethink Music Conference, Day 2: It All Comes Back to Statutory Damages &#124; Just Enrichment</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/12/onto-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-92511</link>
		<dc:creator>Rethink Music Conference, Day 2: It All Comes Back to Statutory Damages &#124; Just Enrichment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=812#comment-92511</guid>
		<description>[...] several major fights about just how far such damages can go, like whether you can recover over $600,000 against a regular filesharer who earned no profits and caused no measurable harm, or whether you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] several major fights about just how far such damages can go, like whether you can recover over $600,000 against a regular filesharer who earned no profits and caused no measurable harm, or whether you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Fights Back &#187; Final Appeal Brief to the First Circuit</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/12/onto-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-70019</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Fights Back &#187; Final Appeal Brief to the First Circuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=812#comment-70019</guid>
		<description>[...] our final brief to the First Circuit. The brief concludes two rounds of briefing by both sides (our earlier brief can be found here, and all the prior briefing by the parties can be found here). This is the last word to the Court [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our final brief to the First Circuit. The brief concludes two rounds of briefing by both sides (our earlier brief can be found here, and all the prior briefing by the parties can be found here). This is the last word to the Court [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mega Ultra Chicken</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/12/onto-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-69769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mega Ultra Chicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=812#comment-69769</guid>
		<description>Number ONE:

Ok I just checked 7th Amendment on Wikipedia (I'm not America) and apparently this gives you a jury trial? So you haven't had a jury trial before?

Number TWO:

Can anyone please explain how the united states law (or please show WHERE in united states law) came up with a value of more than $1 per song for some dude in his room uploading/downloading a few songs? Aren't those $100,000 penalties for companies and stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number ONE:</p>
<p>Ok I just checked 7th Amendment on Wikipedia (I&#8217;m not America) and apparently this gives you a jury trial? So you haven&#8217;t had a jury trial before?</p>
<p>Number TWO:</p>
<p>Can anyone please explain how the united states law (or please show WHERE in united states law) came up with a value of more than $1 per song for some dude in his room uploading/downloading a few songs? Aren&#8217;t those $100,000 penalties for companies and stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'm Back Baby</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/12/onto-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-57594</link>
		<dc:creator>I'm Back Baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=812#comment-57594</guid>
		<description>Joel, I hope to God that you change intellectual property, music, distribution, etc forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, I hope to God that you change intellectual property, music, distribution, etc forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

