RIAA President: The Case for the Innocent Infringer

The case for the innocent infringer — an interview with RIAA President Cary Sherman. From VicelandDOWNLOADING SOME BULLSHIT: AN INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT OF THE RIAA

A few years ago the RIAA switched tactics. Instead of high-profile prosecutions of people who pirated music, you decided to put the onus on the ISPs. How successful was that transition?


The time had come to shift over to a strategy that would be more effective. The lawsuits were obviously controversial in the media, but the reality was that most people had no idea that what they were doing was illegal at the time of those lawsuits. We did all sorts of surveys. We tried PR firms. We did everything to look at how to begin to change the culture of using illegal P2P. We realized that 1) none of the messages resonated, and 2) most people had no idea that what they were doing was illegal, let alone thought it was wrong. That completely flipped overnight when we started the lawsuits. It made an enormous impression and we were constantly generating dinner conversations about what you may or may not do with your computer. We think it would be very good if there were more such conversations about all the other things that can be done inappropriately with a computer. So we think it had a tremendous impact by very clearly searing in the minds of the public that maybe getting all of this stuff for free isn’t legal after all.

Read the rest at Vice Magazine: DOWNLOADING SOME BULLSHIT - An Interview With the President of the RIAA - Vice Magazine

This entry was posted on Saturday, August 21st, 2010 and is filed under featured, perspectives. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

14 Responses to “RIAA President: The Case for the Innocent Infringer”

  1. Borrowing/Lending is evil on August 22nd, 2010 at 5:17 am

    Helpful articles :)

    mellowfellow.co.uk/life/want-to-support-artists-download-their-music-for-free

    jakonrath.blogspot.com/2010/05/piracy-again.html

    Another argument:

    Bastiaan, you’re kidding me…? on July 26th, 2010 at 8:54 am
    The RIAA’s been stealing from artists since the dawn of copyright. Actually, it began with publishing companies stealing from authors. They’re still doing that. Today’s artists/movie producers are yesterday’s authors. Today’s RIAA are yesterday’s publishing companies (yes, still today!). This is what Karl Marx referred to as the synthesis called the MODE OF PRODUCTION between the RELATIONS OF PRODUCTION and the FORCES OF PRODUCTION. Fuck these capitalists.

  2. Borrowing/Lending is evil on August 22nd, 2010 at 5:23 am

    Also, it is interesting to note that when the printing press came out, it was considered Satanic/black magic/heresy. Same thing as what that Bastiaan, you’re kidding me…? guy said

  3. Did The RIAA Just Destroy Its Own Argument Concerning Innocent Infringement? | PHP Hosts on August 24th, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    [...] but the JoelFightsBack website is pointing out that RIAA boss Cary Sherman, in a recent interview, appears to have undermined the industry’s own claims in a recent interview with Vice magazine: The time had come to shift over to a strategy that would [...]

  4. John Batista on August 25th, 2010 at 2:55 am

    1
    @#3

    Truths do not contradict truths. :)

    2

    The RIAA will die if they insist file sharing is “infringement.” As mentioned above, the RIAA will always resist new technology.

    I wonder what would happen if we could clone actual property or if we could psychologically communicate intangible property…

  5. Ashton Kutcher's 'Killer' Pirating Promo on August 25th, 2010 at 5:04 am

    Why does everybody put those?? >> [...]

    [...] Ashton Kutcher is only pirating the first thirteen minutes of his new film (or so he says), Killers, with Katherine Heigl (from his seat inside the movie theater) [...]

  6. Remember... on August 25th, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    globalcomment.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/367px-The.Pirate.Bay.Cartoon-small.png

  7. Castor Anthony on September 2nd, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    Joel, you’ve given a lot of arguments for downloading music, but what you’re being sued for is uploading (i.e. putting it in your shared folder).

  8. RIAA/MPAA = Cunts/Dicks on September 4th, 2010 at 5:24 am

    geekologie(.)com/image.php?path=/2010/02/25/piracy-full.jpg

  9. Joel Tenenbaum is an infringer on September 5th, 2010 at 5:20 am

    To: Remember…

    Home taping is legal. File sharing is illegal. Simple as that. I am a blind legalist.

  10. Joel Tenenbaum is an infringer is a retard on September 5th, 2010 at 9:29 am

    If file sharing hurts sales/kills music, then WiFi kills DSL. Home sewing kills fashion. Home sleeping kills hotels. Water fountains kill the water industry.

  11. Joel Tenenbaum is an infringer is a retard on September 5th, 2010 at 9:32 am

    I am an Economics Student. Those stupid music executives need to adapt to the market and CHANGE. A rule of economics and nature is “Evole or Die”

    They are just greedy assholes who want to keep the current system of £10 - 15 per cd and don’t want to change to a model that may bring in less profit. I hope they all go bankcrupt. I can live without new music untill new companies open up with business models to suit the current market. — StaticID

  12. Abram on September 9th, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    Hello ? extremely fantastic website you have created. I enjoyed studying this submitting. I did need to compose a remark to tell you that the design of this site is really aesthetically pleasing. I used to get a graphic designer, now I am a copy editor. I have constantly enjoyed working with personal computers and am attempting to understand code in my spare time.

  13. tramadol injektion on August 4th, 2011 at 9:03 pm

    gfZ0Ep thx for dat post, was preety decent

  14. Joella Staubin on October 9th, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    12. Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will certainly comeback.

Leave a Reply

Stay Informed

Enter your e-mail address to receive updates about the case:

Donate to the Cause

Inspired to donate a few extra pennies to Joel's defense? We’ll put them towards fighting back.

Share Your Story

More than 30,000 people have settled their cases for between $3,000 - $12,000. Were you one of them? Tell us your story.

Follow Us!

Sites Following Us

What We're Reading

Archives