<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: new trial, please.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/</link>
	<description>It's about more than just music.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel Fights Back &#187; Gertner&#8217;s Ruling on Damages</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-19303</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Fights Back &#187; Gertner&#8217;s Ruling on Damages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 22:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-19303</guid>
		<description>[...] five months after we last sat in Judge Gertner’s courtroom requesting that she either reduce the damages or award a new trial, Judge Gertner finally made a long-awaited ruling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] five months after we last sat in Judge Gertner’s courtroom requesting that she either reduce the damages or award a new trial, Judge Gertner finally made a long-awaited ruling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Fights Back &#187; Case Update</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-17116</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Fights Back &#187; Case Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-17116</guid>
		<description>[...] Hi everyone!  Thanks so much for checking in with us.  The case is definitely not over; rather, we&#8217;re in a holding pattern waiting for Judge Gertner&#8217;s decision regarding our remittitur motion.  (See the details in our blog post) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hi everyone!  Thanks so much for checking in with us.  The case is definitely not over; rather, we&#8217;re in a holding pattern waiting for Judge Gertner&#8217;s decision regarding our remittitur motion.  (See the details in our blog post) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breakfast briefing: Google, Microsoft and Apple go head to head &#8211; while filesharer appeals against $675,000 fine &#124; CompareMobiles.com</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10264</link>
		<dc:creator>Breakfast briefing: Google, Microsoft and Apple go head to head &#8211; while filesharer appeals against $675,000 fine &#124; CompareMobiles.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10264</guid>
		<description>[...] filesharer Joel Tenenbaum &#8211; who was fined $675,000 for putting 30 songs online &#8211; have filed an objection to try and get the ruling overturned. They argue that there were errors made during his trial, and that the fine is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] filesharer Joel Tenenbaum &#8211; who was fined $675,000 for putting 30 songs online &#8211; have filed an objection to try and get the ruling overturned. They argue that there were errors made during his trial, and that the fine is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breakfast briefing: Google, Microsoft and Apple go head to head - while filesharer appeals against $675,000 fine @ Technology News</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10260</link>
		<dc:creator>Breakfast briefing: Google, Microsoft and Apple go head to head - while filesharer appeals against $675,000 fine @ Technology News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10260</guid>
		<description>[...] convicted American filesharer Joel Tenenbaum - who was fined 5,000 for putting 30 songs online - have filed an objection to try and get the ruling overturned. They argue that there were errors made during his trial, and that the fine is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] convicted American filesharer Joel Tenenbaum - who was fined 5,000 for putting 30 songs online - have filed an objection to try and get the ruling overturned. They argue that there were errors made during his trial, and that the fine is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Sharer Asks for Reduced Fine, Retrial - Mobile News</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10231</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Sharer Asks for Reduced Fine, Retrial - Mobile News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10231</guid>
		<description>[...] Fine, Retrial   The student ordered to pay US$675,000 for sharing music online has asked for a new trial and for a reduction in the amount of damages he must pay. He is calling upon a precedent set by a Supreme Court case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fine, Retrial   The student ordered to pay US$675,000 for sharing music online has asked for a new trial and for a reduction in the amount of damages he must pay. He is calling upon a precedent set by a Supreme Court case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erano le major a incoraggiare il P2P</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10229</link>
		<dc:creator>Erano le major a incoraggiare il P2P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10229</guid>
		<description>[...] quasi 470mila euro: la corte lo aveva condannato violazione della propriet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quasi 470mila euro: la corte lo aveva condannato violazione della propriet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Sharer Asks for Reduced Fine, Retrial &#124; News of the World</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10223</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Sharer Asks for Reduced Fine, Retrial &#124; News of the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10223</guid>
		<description>[...] comports with any of our traditional notions of fairness and Due Process?&#8221; reads a post on  Tenenbaum&#8217;s blog . The $30 figure is based on the typical $0.99 price tag for most digital songs but does not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comports with any of our traditional notions of fairness and Due Process?&#8221; reads a post on  Tenenbaum&#8217;s blog . The $30 figure is based on the typical $0.99 price tag for most digital songs but does not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulhuzz</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10185</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulhuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10185</guid>
		<description>@sam -- that's a rather narrow interpretation of the motion filed...fortunately you're not defending Joel. lurk moar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sam &#8212; that&#8217;s a rather narrow interpretation of the motion filed&#8230;fortunately you&#8217;re not defending Joel. lurk moar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10181</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10181</guid>
		<description>tldr: You're doing it wrong.  Award was too much and iTunes existing doesn't mean there was an equal alternative available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tldr: You&#8217;re doing it wrong.  Award was too much and iTunes existing doesn&#8217;t mean there was an equal alternative available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://joelfightsback.com/2010/01/new-trial-please/comment-page-1/#comment-10179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Beckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelfightsback.com/?p=730#comment-10179</guid>
		<description>Good luck on the motion! It would surely be an embarrassment to our judicial system for such a verdict to remain on the books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck on the motion! It would surely be an embarrassment to our judicial system for such a verdict to remain on the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
