Comments on: joel’s version of today’s hearing

By: Arlyne Blackshear

Arlyne Blackshear — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:17:50 +0000

Please write additional about domina and bdsm I really like the topic and this article was genuinely helpful to comprehend

By: Luis Lindemuth

Luis Lindemuth — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:42:36 +0000

Mistress makes me mindblowed!

By: Del Maymon

Del Maymon — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:52:21 +0000

I d like to get a domme like this one ! More posts like this?

By: Mistress Mary

Mistress Mary — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:31:10 +0000

I need more domme posts like this one , please more!

By: Dominant lady

Dominant lady — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:23:24 +0000

Dominant girls like this one are just the best stress relief ever! More to come?

By: Sherri Mintz

Sherri Mintz — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:15:45 +0000

I want to get some more dominatrix post , this on was mindblowing , thank you !

By: Alter_Fritz

Alter_Fritz — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:38:18 +0000

Joel wrote: “As the first item of business Professor Nesson argues at least for the court to audiorecord the proceedings to preserve a record, but Judge Gertner seems reticent to brush against the boundaries of what she might not be allowed to do, especially having been overruled by the Appeals court last time she made a ruling on recording.”

I understand that the courtreporter [the person that wants $3 (OMG!) *per page*] will do this pages some times with the help of an audiorecording of the proceedings. (THESE are recordings that are expressly mentioned as ALLOWED in the rules at hand).

While I don’t know if courtreporter did an audio recording in this case and if (s)he did, what procedure (s)he uses in handling those tapes (one set of tapes per session not overwritten in later proceedings but archived by courtreporter for example), can’t the judge simply order that the courtreporter keeps the tapes (s)he uses secure in escrow until the highest court will rule about this transparency stuff of public court proceedings?
Judge Gertner would clearly NOT be in conflict with the 1st circuit ruling when she directs orders towards the courtreporter regarding his(her) tapes, would she?