http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/request-for-rule-change-denied/ It's about more than just music. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:19:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/request-for-rule-change-denied/comment-page-1/#comment-150630 Mauro Vietzke Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:27:43 +0000 http://joelfightsback.com/?p=527#comment-150630 44. whoah this blog is magnificent i love reading your posts. Keep up the good work! You know, a lot of people are searching around for this information, you can help them greatly. 44. whoah this blog is magnificent i love reading your posts. Keep up the good work! You know, a lot of people are searching around for this information, you can help them greatly.

]]> http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/request-for-rule-change-denied/comment-page-1/#comment-58246 Elvia Papandrea Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:12:44 +0000 http://joelfightsback.com/?p=527#comment-58246 Completely understand what your stance on this matter. Even though I would disagree on some of the finer particulars, I think you do an awesome work explaining it. Positive beats having to investigation it on my own. Many thanks Completely understand what your stance on this matter. Even though I would disagree on some of the finer particulars, I think you do an awesome work explaining it. Positive beats having to investigation it on my own. Many thanks

]]> http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/request-for-rule-change-denied/comment-page-1/#comment-1108 Mark Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:03:52 +0000 http://joelfightsback.com/?p=527#comment-1108 An addition to the public policy interests raised, I would respectfully invite the attention of the appellate court to Mr. Tenenbaum's rights under Amendment One to the Constitution, namely that within certain broad limits Mr. Tenenbaum has a right to self-expression. Saying that, I would put it to the appellate bench here that there is no significant difference between Mr. Tenenbaum procuring a copy of the transcript of the argument and posting it on the internet, and the court producing an audio recording and making it available in real-time. An addition to the public policy interests raised, I would respectfully invite the attention of the appellate court to Mr. Tenenbaum’s rights under Amendment One to the Constitution, namely that within certain broad limits Mr. Tenenbaum has a right to self-expression. Saying that, I would put it to the appellate bench here that there is no significant difference between Mr. Tenenbaum procuring a copy of the transcript of the argument and posting it on the internet, and the court producing an audio recording and making it available in real-time.

]]>