Comments on: First Circuit Oral Hearings now online http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/first-circuit-oral-hearings-now-online/ It's about more than just music. Thu, 17 May 2012 01:26:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: работа в омске http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/first-circuit-oral-hearings-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-234280 работа в омске Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:18:12 +0000 http://joelfightsback.com/?p=385#comment-234280 <strong>работа в омске...</strong> [...]Joel Fights Back » First Circuit Oral Hearings now online[...]... работа в омске…

[...]Joel Fights Back » First Circuit Oral Hearings now online[...]…

]]> By: Ray Beckerman http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/first-circuit-oral-hearings-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-441 Ray Beckerman Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:07:32 +0000 http://joelfightsback.com/?p=385#comment-441 It is notoriously impossible to predict how an appeals court will rule after hearing the argument. Being a risk taker here are my predictions as to what the ruling will be: 1. The Judicial Council Resolution is not binding. 2. The District Court rule permits a judge to allow cameras in an appropriate instance. 3. Judge Gertner's decision to allow a narrowcast of the oral argument in question was within the exercise of a sound judicial discretion and therefore not properly subject to review on a writ of prohibition. 4. Petition denied. In dictum they may repudiate the notion that the internet should stand on a different footing than other news media. It is notoriously impossible to predict how an appeals court will rule after hearing the argument.

Being a risk taker here are my predictions as to what the ruling will be:

1. The Judicial Council Resolution is not binding.
2. The District Court rule permits a judge to allow cameras in an appropriate instance.
3. Judge Gertner’s decision to allow a narrowcast of the oral argument in question was within the exercise of a sound judicial discretion and therefore not properly subject to review on a writ of prohibition.
4. Petition denied.

In dictum they may repudiate the notion that the internet should stand on a different footing than other news media.

]]> By: Alter_Fritz http://joelfightsback.com/2009/04/first-circuit-oral-hearings-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-428 Alter_Fritz Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:08:50 +0000 http://joelfightsback.com/?p=385#comment-428 The original audio recording has a very low volume which makes it hard to hear the lawyers arguments and nearly impossible to hear what the judges (on the left channel) were saying. So I took the liberty and used some Hard Limiting procedure on it (boost by 30 dB, cutof at -0.5dB i.e. I made it "louder"). No further edits -no tech savvy individual (that the RIAA lawyers argumentatively fears) here- except adding some descriptive Metadata to the file too, were made. http://rapidshare.com/files/219297423/09-1090_edited.mp3 hth again -- A_F The original audio recording has a very low volume which makes it hard to hear the lawyers arguments and nearly impossible to hear what the judges (on the left channel) were saying.
So I took the liberty and used some Hard Limiting procedure on it (boost by 30 dB, cutof at -0.5dB i.e. I made it “louder”). No further edits -no tech savvy individual (that the RIAA lawyers argumentatively fears) here- except adding some descriptive Metadata to the file too, were made.

http://rapidshare.com/files/219297423/09-1090_edited.mp3

hth again
–
A_F

]]>